For
almost a week there has been a persistent rumor that another snowstorm is on
the way. I traced this back to radio
spreading the rumor that Farmers’ Almanac had predicted the past two snowstorms
and was predicting a third. I was
frequently asked if there was another snowstorm on the way, for which I
answered no. The response was almost
always “Well, Farmers’ Almanac is predicting another snowstorm and it predicted
the last two.” What?
So
I investigated this claim. First let me
point out that there is a Farmers’ Almanac (dating back to 1818) and an Old
Farmer’s Almanac (dating back to 1792).
It was Old Farmer’s Almanac that was predicting snow. Second the forecasts are so vague as to be of
little value. Neither ever forecasted
sleet or freezing rain and thus the ice that was so devastating.
Yet
there were a few that were adamant that Old Farmer’s Almanac got it right. If that is the case, then why ever watch the
media. Let’s explore the claim.
I
do not have the forecast breakdown for January, but I did get it for
February. For the period of February
7-14, the forecast is for “periods rain and snow, then sunny, cold”. It was during this period that the snowstorm
occurred (11-13). But, wait! The forecast is for the entire region from
south Georgia to southeast Virginia. It
also includes the Piedmont as well as coastal areas.
Does
this forecast apply equally to all locations?
Are we to apply this with rain in the south and snow in the north? If so, where is the rain/snow line? Where is there any mention of ice? Where does it even say snowstorm? Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines snowstorm
as a disturbance of the atmosphere marked by a heavy amount of precipitation in
the form of small white ice crystals. In
their forecast how much snow will fall?
Yes,
but Jim, there was a snowstorm moving through the region at that time. Ok, let’s look at the climatology of snow in
Columbia, SC. On average we get a snow
once every two years. The highest
probability of snow comes in February. I
get this all the time; it’s January and we haven’t seen any snow. People are disappointed until I tell them
that February is our snowiest month.
Furthermore
there is a higher probability of snow in North Carolina and southeast Virginia
during this time. Plus, you have given
yourself a week for this to happen. The
odds are greatly in your favor for something to happen somewhere in the
region. The odds favor periods of rain
and snow in this region at this time.
However, the forecast is of little value because it does not say where
in the region, it just says somewhere in the region. This is not “calling for a snowstorm”.
Let’s
look at the forecast for Feb. 21-26 that got everyone excited. It calls for “rain to snow, then sunny,
cold”. It is this that people
interpreted as saying that a third snowstorm was going to occur. For the record, it did not happen. Furthermore, the forecast for Feb. 27-28 is “Rainy,
cool”. It will be cool, but it will also
be bone dry for South Carolina.
To
be fair Farmers’ Almanac was not calling for any snow during the Feb. 21 to 28
timeframe, just some rain.
Both
publications claim to have an accuracy of 80-85%. However, they provide no evidence to support
this claim. How is the claim
derived? Is it for the U.S. as a whole
or does it apply to a certain region? Do
all regions have the same accuracy? Why
do the forecasts for each almanac differ?
I find it very hard to believe that the accuracy in December, the
farthest month out, is as accurate as the preceding January, a near month from
when the forecast is issued.
Years
ago an independent verification was done on the almanacs. The best that could be determined was that
their forecast of departure from normal was right about 50% of the time. Otherwise, you were better off flipping a
coin. It is amazing to see the almanacs
make their claim of accurate forecasts, even pointing out specific cases. However, they never note their misses.
Look
at the chart at the bottom of the page for Old Farmer’s Almanac. This is the forecast for departure from normal
for each month. If you look at Columbia
which is in the middle of the region for Old Farmer’s Almanac these are the
results for the past four months:
Month
|
Old Farmer’s
Almanac
|
Actual
|
November
|
Cold, Wet
|
Cold, Dry
|
December
|
Cold, Dry
|
Warm, Wet
|
January
|
Warm, Dry
|
Cold, Dry
|
February*
|
Cold, Average
|
Warm, Dry
|
· The information for
February is through the 26th, but will not change even with just two
days left.
Neither
almanac forecast the unseasonably warm weather last week leading to a record
high temperature on Thursday of 84° F.
The average temperature last week was 6.4° F above normal.
The Bottom Line
The
forecast for both almanacs are so vague that the forecasts are of little value. Their claims of accuracy have never been
substantiated independently.
That
is not to say that there isn’t useful information in the almanacs. There is, it’s just that the weather forecasts
are not one of them.
The
forecasts should be used for entertainment purposes only.